A story as old as time: Tension of old vs new.
When is standing still falling behind? The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is finding out.
True, the Chamber’s role is to represent members’ interests. But when some members are treated more equal than others, it causes friction.
It also caused angst as the Chamber’s PR team tried to sidestep the problem without talking about it.
When an organization’s reputation is on the line, a more direct approach gets better results.
The latest dust-up came this week when giant CVS Health Corporation, which last year banned the sale of tobacco in its 7,800 retail stores and pharmacies, resigned its membership after it was reported that the Chamber is vigorously lobbying against anti-smoking laws around the world.
That disclosure also created discomfort for four other healthcare companies, including Anthem, that serve on the Chamber’s Board of Directors and had made their feelings known to no avail.
This is only the latest controversy for the Chamber.
In 2009, Apple — the world’s most valuable company — quit over the Chamber’s adamant opposition to regulations to limit global warming. In 2013, the U.S. division of major Swedish construction company Skanska resigned because the Chamber was lobbying against green building codes.
Picking sides is always tricky, especially in an organization with members whose interests are as diverse as the Chamber. All the more reason to tread carefully.
Traveling the same worn path out of habit is seldom a good idea. Neither is embracing new concepts simply because they’re new. But listening with an open mind is. So is reassessing old ideas if new evidence and shifting public perceptions warrant.
It’s a story as old as time, and it’s true for all facets of society. Those who unyieldingly dig their heels into the past are punished as their reputation erodes. Those who adapt when appropriate are rewarded as their credibility and reputation strengthen.
For a deeper glimpse into our world, see our book on Amazon, A Lawyer’s Guide to Crisis PR: Protecting Your Clients In & From the Media.
If you don’t already subscribe, please sign up for our blog, Insights on High-Stakes PR.
You can reach Roger Gillott and Eden Gillott directly at 310-396-8696.
Gillott Communications is a Los Angeles-based public relations firm that specializes in high-stakes Crisis & Reputation Management with more than 50 years of expertise in strategic communications, corporate public relations, and working with the media.
Follow us on Instagram and LinkedIn where we share amazing tips on how to protect your reputation and mitigate damage during a crisis.
Choices that are literally a matter of life and death, like tobacco and fossil fuels, have life as a weight tipping the scale, regardless of a mixed constituency, no?
K.C., you’re right that some issues should outweigh political preferences. But far too often they don’t.
Choices that are literally a matter of life and death, like tobacco and fossil fuels, have life as a weight tipping the scale, regardless of a mixed constituency, no?
K.C., you’re right that some issues should outweigh political preferences. But far too often they don’t.
A problem companies often face is that they try to be everything to everyone. When companies face a PR crisis they need to decide what the core values of the company are and shape the message based on their core values. Or – are their core values out of date? What is the message they want to give?
The company should already know what their core values are before they face a PR crisis. If they don’t, that’s a whole other problem in and of itself.
When a PR crisis hits, they need to assess if what they’ve already been doing is aligned with their core values. In addition, they must determine what they want to achieve. These two things heavily influence how you’ll craft your message(s). That way they can create a road map between where they are now and where they want to be.
A problem companies often face is that they try to be everything to everyone. When companies face a PR crisis they need to decide what the core values of the company are and shape the message based on their core values. Or – are their core values out of date? What is the message they want to give?