Quid Pro Quo

two-hands-forming-square

Quid pro quo of Crisis PR: Swapping access for ink.

In the 1950s and ’60s, John Howard Griffin, a white Texas journalist who had his skin medically darkened then wrote Black Like Me about his experiences traveling in the segregated South, was hailed by liberals and condemned by conservatives.

For years, singer Michael Jackson was a source of confusion and controversy over speculation that he was bleaching his skin to look white.

Today, Rachel Dolezal, the head of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP, is trying to cope with allegations by her parents that she’s really white, not black as she has claimed.

She’s off to a stumbling start.

Her initial comment, “There’s a lot of complexities…” did nothing to sate the media’s appetite or get ahead of the story. Rather it invited more speculation.

 

From a Reputation Management perspective, what Griffin, Jackson, and Dolezal did — or didn’t do — ultimately matters less than how they presented it.

Consider Bruce Jenner. He was high profile. His decision was dramatic. Even though homosexuality was gaining wide public acceptance, gender change was barely a blip on the radar.

Through a PR lens, Jenner’s transition into Caitlyn has been rolled out flawlessly. The ABC News interview with Diane Sawyer. The cover of Vanity Fair. Jenner’s one-liner that so memorably summed up the rationale: “Bruce always had to tell a lie. Caitlyn has no secrets.”

Did Jenner really come up with those words herself? Were they given to her by her PR team? Does it matter?

Did Vanity Fair feel “used” by those handling Jenner’s PR? No.

Why? Because events are routinely orchestrated, from publicizing new movies to managing political campaigns. This is no different, as long as both sides know the rules of the game.

 

The most basic rule is quid pro quo.

Each has something the other wants. The media controls the ink. The PR person controls access. This is where the bargaining begins and ends. The ultimate goal is managing the message to frame the story.

 

For a deeper glimpse into our world, see our book on Amazon, A Lawyer’s Guide to Crisis PR: Protecting Your Clients In & From the Media.

If you don’t already subscribe, please sign up for our blogInsights on High-Stakes PR.

You can reach Roger Gillott and Eden Gillott directly at 310-396-8696.

 

FaviconInitialsGillott Communications is a Los Angeles-based public relations firm that specializes in high-stakes Crisis & Reputation Management with more than 50 years of expertise in strategic communications, corporate public relations, and working with the media.

Follow us on Instagram and LinkedIn where we share amazing tips on how to protect your reputation and mitigate damage during a crisis.

2 thoughts on “Quid Pro Quo

  1. I know none of these people, so am speculating,, but speculating based on many of my own life experiences and intimate knowledge of others. It seems that in addition to a better PR team, what Caitlin has that Michael and Rachel do not is a lack of embarrassment or shame over what is being done. There was no need to cringe and make cringing responses to the media. I am not saying there was never guilt or shame, but it did not seem to be there by the time the transformation work was made public. That is a huge difference – nothing to hide.

  2. I know none of these people, so am speculating,, but speculating based on many of my own life experiences and intimate knowledge of others. It seems that in addition to a better PR team, what Caitlin has that Michael and Rachel do not is a lack of embarrassment or shame over what is being done. There was no need to cringe and make cringing responses to the media. I am not saying there was never guilt or shame, but it did not seem to be there by the time the transformation work was made public. That is a huge difference – nothing to hide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *